Casio Duro MDV106 vs Rado True Square Automatic
Casio's diver meets Rado's timepiece
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Rado True Square Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Duro MDV106 measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The True Square Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Duro MDV106 | Rado True Square Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $1,500–$2,500 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 38mm (Square) |
| Movement | Quartz Module 2784 | Automatic ETA C07.611 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) |
| Power Reserve | 3-Year Battery | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) Diver | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Rado's approach
The Casio Duro MDV106 features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Rado True Square Automatic offers Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic construction at 38mm (Square) with Sapphire (Anti-Reflective). Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 2784 vs Automatic ETA C07.611
The Duro MDV106 runs the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The True Square Automatic uses the Automatic ETA C07.611 (Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based), 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The True Square Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44mm vs 38mm (Square) — different wrist presence
At 44mm, the Duro MDV106 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the True Square Automatic at 38mm (Square). Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Duro MDV106 sits at $50–$100 and the Rado True Square Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Duro MDV106 uses Mineral Glass with 3-Year Battery, against Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) and 80 Hours on the True Square Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Duro MDV106 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) Diver while the True Square Automatic handles 50m (5 ATM). The Duro MDV106 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) Diver water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonRado
True Square Automatic
Choose the Rado True Square Automatic if you value Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 38mm (Square) proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ETA C07.611 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Duro MDV106 and Rado True Square Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Rado delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.