Casio Duro MDV106 vs Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80
Casio's diver meets Tissot's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The Duro MDV106 measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The Le Locle Powermatic 80 counters with Swiss Made (Swatch Group) craftsmanship and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Duro MDV106 | Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 39.3mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 2784 | Powermatic 80.111 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | ETA-Based Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 3-Year Battery | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) Diver | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Swiss Made (Swatch Group) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Casio Duro MDV106 features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers Stainless Steel construction at 39.3mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 2784 vs Powermatic 80.111
The Duro MDV106 runs the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Le Locle Powermatic 80 uses the Powermatic 80.111 (ETA-Based Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44mm vs 39.3mm — different wrist presence
At 44mm, the Duro MDV106 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Le Locle Powermatic 80 at 39.3mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Duro MDV106 sits at $50–$100 and the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Duro MDV106 uses Mineral Glass with 3-Year Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Le Locle Powermatic 80. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Duro MDV106 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) Diver while the Le Locle Powermatic 80 handles 30m (3 ATM). The Duro MDV106 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) Diver water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Le Locle Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 if you value ETA-Based Automatic technology, Swiss Made (Swatch Group) heritage, and 39.3mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Duro MDV106 and Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made (Swatch Group) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.