Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio F-91W vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Casio's timepiece meets Bulova's chronograph

Quick Verdict

The Casio F-91W (Under $50) offers Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The F-91W measures 35mm and is rated 30m (Splash Resistant). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph counters with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio F-91W

Casio

F-91W

Under $50

Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

$500–$1,000

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio F-91WBulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
PriceUnder $50$500–$1,000
Case Size35mm45mm
MovementQuartz Module 593High-Performance 262kHz Quartz
Caliber TypeCasio Digital Quartz (Battery)High-Performance Quartz
Power Reserve7-Year BatteryN/A (Quartz)
Water Resistance30m (Splash Resistant)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalAcrylicSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialResinStainless Steel
OriginCasio (Japan)Made in Japan (Citizen Group)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Bulova's approach

The Casio F-91W features a Resin case at 35mm with Acrylic protection. The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph offers Stainless Steel construction at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Quartz Module 593 vs High-Performance 262kHz Quartz

The F-91W runs the Quartz Module 593 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 7-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz). The F-91W edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

35mm vs 45mm — different wrist presence

At 35mm, the F-91W wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (Splash Resistant) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio F-91W sits at Under $50 and the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the F-91W uses Acrylic with 7-Year Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and N/A (Quartz) on the Lunar Pilot Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Bulova

30m (Splash Resistant) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The F-91W is rated to 30m (Splash Resistant) while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph handles 50m (5 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

F-91W

Choose the Casio F-91W if you prioritize Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 30m (Splash Resistant) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 593 with 7-Year Battery power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you value High-Performance Quartz technology, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage, and 45mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio F-91W and Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Bulova delivers Made in Japan (Citizen Group) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio F-91W (Under $50) offers Quartz Module 593 with 7-Year Battery power reserve, while the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000) features High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Casio (Japan) craftsmanship vs Made in Japan (Citizen Group) engineering.
The Casio F-91W offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The F-91W at 35mm with 30m (Splash Resistant) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The F-91W uses Acrylic while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than acrylic.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.