Is the Casio F-91W better than the Orient Mako 40 Green?

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio F-91W (~$20) offers Quartz Module 593 with 7-Year Battery power reserve, while the Orient Mako 40 Green (~$260) features Automatic Caliber F6922 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Casio (Japan) craftsmanship vs Made in Japan engineering.

Casio F-91W vs Orient Mako 40 Green — which is better value?

The Casio F-91W offers better upfront value at $240 less. However, the Orient Mako 40 Green may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Can you wear the Casio F-91W and Orient Mako 40 Green daily?

Both are suitable for daily wear. The F-91W at 35mm with 30m (Splash Resistant) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. Both feature Acrylic for scratch resistance.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio F-91W vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Name: Casio F-91W
Brand: Casio

Casio's timepiece meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio F-91W (~$20) offers Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) precision at $240 less than the Orient Mako 40 Green (~$260). The Mako 40 Green counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective price points.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

F-91W

~$20

Check Price Full Review

Orient

Mako 40 Green

~$260

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio F-91W	Orient Mako 40 Green
Price	~$20	~$260
Case Size	35mm	40mm
Movement	Quartz Module 593	Automatic Caliber F6922
Caliber Type	Casio Digital Quartz (Battery)	Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve	7-Year Battery	40 Hours
Water Resistance	30m (Splash Resistant)	200m (20 ATM)
Crystal	Acrylic	Sapphire Crystal
Case Material	Resin	Stainless Steel
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Orient's approach

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Quartz Module 593 vs Automatic Caliber F6922

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

35mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio is $240 more affordable

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

30m (Splash Resistant) vs 200m (20 ATM)

Our Verdict

Casio

F-91W

Choose the Casio F-91W if you prioritize Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 30m (Splash Resistant) water resistance. At ~$20, it delivers Quartz Module 593 with 7-Year Battery power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At ~$260, the Automatic Caliber F6922 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches

The Bottom Line

The Casio F-91W and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio F-91W

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio F-91W

Two timepieces compared — ~$850 vs ~$20

Explore These Watches

Casio F-91W — Full Review Orient Mako 40 Green — Full Review Browse All Guides