Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Casio MRW-230H vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Casio's timepiece meets Maurice Lacroix's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Aikon Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

CasioMRW-230HUnder $50 Check price View the dossier

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

MRW-230H

Under $50

Check Price Full Review

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

$1,500–$2,500

View the dossier Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio MRW-230H	Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
Price	Under $50	$1,500–$2,500
Case Size	44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm)	42mm
Movement	Quartz	Automatic ML115
Caliber Type	Casio Quartz (Battery)	Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base)
Power Reserve	Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW)	38 Hours
Water Resistance	100m (10 ATM)	200m (20 ATM)
Crystal	Resin Glass	Sapphire Crystal
Case Material	Resin case, aluminum bezel ring	Stainless Steel
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Swiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Maurice Lacroix's approach

The Casio MRW-230H features a Resin case, aluminum bezel ring case at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass protection. The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 42mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Maurice Lacroix

Quartz vs Automatic ML115

The MRW-230H runs the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Aikon Automatic uses the Automatic ML115 (Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base), 38 Hours reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz). The Aikon Automatic offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Maurice Lacroix

44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) vs 42mm — different wrist presence

At 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm), the MRW-230H has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Aikon Automatic at 42mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio MRW-230H sits at Under $50 and the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the MRW-230H uses Resin Glass with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW), against Sapphire Crystal and 38 Hours on the Aikon Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Maurice Lacroix

100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The MRW-230H is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Aikon Automatic handles 200m (20 ATM). The Aikon Automatic offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

MRW-230H

Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

Choose the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if you value Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 42mm proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ML115 with 38 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Casio MRW-230H and Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Maurice Lacroix delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Casio MRW-230H is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio MRW-230H sits a band lower (Under $50 against $1,500–$2,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Casio MRW-230H offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The MRW-230H at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Aikon Automatic at 42mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The MRW-230H uses Resin Glass while the Aikon Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal.

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio MRW-230H

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Maurice Lacroix's diver

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio MRW-230H

Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs Under $50

Explore These Watches

Casio MRW-230H — Full Review Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.