Updated
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio MRW-230H
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs Under $50
Quick Verdict
The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Powermatic 80.111. Both represent excellent choices in the timepiece category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 | Casio MRW-230H |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | Under $50 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) |
| Movement | Automatic Powermatic 80.111 | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Scratch-resistant Sapphire | Resin Glass |
| Case Material | 316L Stainless Steel | Resin case, aluminum bezel ring |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Tissot's design language vs Casio's approach
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 features a 316L Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Scratch-resistant Sapphire protection. The Casio MRW-230H offers Resin case, aluminum bezel ring construction at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Powermatic 80.111 vs Quartz
The PRX Powermatic 80 runs the Automatic Powermatic 80.111 (In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The MRW-230H uses the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) reserve) at standard. The MRW-230H offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the PRX Powermatic 80 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the MRW-230H at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm). Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio MRW-230H at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire with 80 Hours, against Resin Glass and Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) on the MRW-230H. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The PRX Powermatic 80 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the MRW-230H handles 100m (10 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Tissot
PRX Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 if you prioritize In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
MRW-230H
Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 and Casio MRW-230H represent two distinct approaches to the timepiece category — the Tissot bringing Swiss Made tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

