Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Casio MRW-230H vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Casio's timepiece meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Mako 40 Green counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

CasioMRW-230HUnder $50 Check price OrientMako 40 Green$250–$500 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

MRW-230H

Under $50

Check Price Full Review

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio MRW-230H	Orient Mako 40 Green
Price	Under $50	$250–$500
Case Size	44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm)	40mm
Movement	Quartz	Automatic Caliber F6722
Caliber Type	Casio Quartz (Battery)	Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve	Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW)	40 Hours
Water Resistance	100m (10 ATM)	200m (20 ATM)
Crystal	Resin Glass	Sapphire Crystal
Case Material	Resin case, aluminum bezel ring	Stainless Steel
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Orient's approach

The Casio MRW-230H features a Resin case, aluminum bezel ring case at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Quartz vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The MRW-230H runs the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Orient

44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm), the MRW-230H has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio MRW-230H sits at Under $50 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the MRW-230H uses Resin Glass with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW), against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The MRW-230H is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

MRW-230H

Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Casio MRW-230H and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Orient Mako 40 Green is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Casio MRW-230H is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Orient Mako 40 Green is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio MRW-230H sits a band lower (Under $50 against $250–$500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Casio MRW-230H offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Orient Mako 40 Green may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The MRW-230H at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The MRW-230H uses Resin Glass while the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal.

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio MRW-230H

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio MRW-230H

Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs Under $50

Explore These Watches

Casio MRW-230H — Full Review Orient Mako 40 Green — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.