Updated
Casio MRW-230H vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm
Two timepieces compared — Under $50 vs $500–$1,000
Quick Verdict
The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm ($500–$1,000). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional timepieces for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MRW-230H | Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) | 35mm |
| Movement | Quartz | Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | ETA/Tissot Automatic |
| Power Reserve | Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Resin Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Resin case, aluminum bezel ring | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Casio MRW-230H features a Resin case, aluminum bezel ring case at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass protection. The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm offers Stainless Steel construction at 35mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
The MRW-230H runs the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve) at standard frequency. The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) vs 35mm — different wrist presence
At 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm), the MRW-230H has a bolder wrist presence compared to the PRX Powermatic 80 35mm at 35mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio MRW-230H sits at Under $50 and the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the MRW-230H uses Resin Glass with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW), against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the PRX Powermatic 80 35mm. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The MRW-230H is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the PRX Powermatic 80 35mm handles 100m (10 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Casio
MRW-230H
Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
PRX Powermatic 80 35mm
Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 35mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
View the dossierThe Bottom Line
The Casio MRW-230H and Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm represent two distinct approaches to the timepiece category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

