Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Casio MRW-230H vs Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon"

Two timepieces compared — Under $50 vs $10,000–$25,000

Quick Verdict

The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" ($10,000–$25,000). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional timepieces for their respective tiers.

CasioMRW-230HUnder $50 Check price RolexDatejust 36 "Wimbledon"$10,000–$25,000 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

MRW-230H

Under $50

Check Price Full Review

Rolex

Datejust 36 "Wimbledon"

$10,000–$25,000

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio MRW-230H	Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon"
Price	Under $50	$10,000–$25,000
Case Size	44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm)	36mm
Movement	Quartz	Automatic Caliber 3235
Caliber Type	Casio Quartz (Battery)	Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day)
Power Reserve	Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW)	70 Hours
Water Resistance	100m (10 ATM)	100m (10 ATM)
Crystal	Resin Glass	Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops
Case Material	Resin case, aluminum bezel ring	Oystersteel
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Swiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Rolex's approach

The Casio MRW-230H features a Resin case, aluminum bezel ring case at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass protection. The Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" offers Oystersteel construction at 36mm with Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Rolex

Quartz vs Automatic Caliber 3235

The MRW-230H runs the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" uses the Automatic Caliber 3235 (Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day), 70 Hours reserve) at standard. The Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Rolex

44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) vs 36mm — different wrist presence

At 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm), the MRW-230H has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" at 36mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio MRW-230H sits at Under $50 and the Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" at $10,000–$25,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the MRW-230H uses Resin Glass with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW), against Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops and 70 Hours on the Datejust 36 "Wimbledon". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)

The MRW-230H is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" handles 100m (10 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Casio

MRW-230H

Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Rolex

Datejust 36 "Wimbledon"

Choose the Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" if you value Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 36mm proportions. At $10,000–$25,000, the Automatic Caliber 3235 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Casio MRW-230H and Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" represent two distinct approaches to the timepiece category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Rolex delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Casio MRW-230H is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. On price, the Casio MRW-230H sits a band lower (Under $50 against $10,000–$25,000), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Casio MRW-230H offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The MRW-230H at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" at 36mm with 100m (10 ATM) is similarly capable. The MRW-230H uses Resin Glass while the Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" uses Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops.

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio MRW-230H

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon"

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Rolex's timepiece

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio MRW-230H

Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs Under $50

Explore These Watches

Casio MRW-230H — Full Review Rolex Datejust 36 "Wimbledon" — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.