Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Casio's field watch meets Casio's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150) and Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak ($100–$150) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The MTP-S120L Solar Field emphasizes Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering while the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak focuses on Made in Japan craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

$100–$150

Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Casio

G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio MTP-S120L Solar FieldCasio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak
Price$100–$150$100–$150
Case Size42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm)45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick)
MovementSolar-Powered QuartzQuartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth)
Caliber TypeCasio Tough Solar QuartzCasio Quartz (Solar-Powered)
Power ReserveMonths on a full solar charge; no battery replacementAbout 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio)
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalMineral CrystalMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelCarbon Core Guard Resin
OriginCasio (Japan)Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Casio's approach

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak offers Carbon Core Guard Resin construction at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Solar-Powered Quartz vs Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth)

The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak uses the Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) (Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered), About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) reserve) at standard. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) — different wrist presence

At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick). Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Mineral Glass and About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) on the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak handles 200m (20 ATM). The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Casio

G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Choose the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak if you value Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) with About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The MTP-S120L Solar Field emphasizes Casio Tough Solar Quartz technology while the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak prioritizes Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered) precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The MTP-S120L Solar Field at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal while the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak uses Mineral Glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.