Updated
Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm
Two field watchs compared — $100–$150 vs $500–$1,000
Quick Verdict
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150) offers Casio Tough Solar Quartz precision in the tier below the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm ($500–$1,000). The MTP-S120L Solar Field measures 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional field watchs for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field | Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $100–$150 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) | 38mm |
| Movement | Solar-Powered Quartz | Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Tough Solar Quartz | Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound |
| Power Reserve | Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Hamilton's approach
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm offers Stainless Steel construction at 38mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Solar-Powered Quartz vs Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base)
The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm uses the Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) (Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 38mm — different wrist presence
At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm at 38mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm handles 50m (5 ATM). The MTP-S120L Solar Field is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
MTP-S120L Solar Field
Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonHamilton
Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm
Choose the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm if you value Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 38mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm represent two distinct approaches to the field watch category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Hamilton delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

