Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Casio's field watch meets Bulova's chronograph

Quick Verdict

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150) offers Casio Tough Solar Quartz precision in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The MTP-S120L Solar Field measures 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph counters with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

CasioMTP-S120L Solar Field$100–$150 Check price View the dossier

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

$100–$150

Check Price Full Review

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

$500–$1,000

View the dossier Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field	Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Price	$100–$150	$500–$1,000
Case Size	42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm)	45mm
Movement	Solar-Powered Quartz	High-Performance 262kHz Quartz
Caliber Type	Casio Tough Solar Quartz	High-Performance Quartz
Power Reserve	Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement	N/A (Quartz)
Water Resistance	100m (10 ATM)	50m (5 ATM)
Crystal	Mineral Crystal	Sapphire Crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel	Stainless Steel
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Made in Japan (Citizen Group)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Bulova's approach

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph offers Stainless Steel construction at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Solar-Powered Quartz vs High-Performance 262kHz Quartz

The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz). Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 45mm — different wrist presence

At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Sapphire Crystal and N/A (Quartz) on the Lunar Pilot Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph handles 50m (5 ATM). The MTP-S120L Solar Field is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you value High-Performance Quartz technology, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage, and 45mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Bulova delivers Made in Japan (Citizen Group) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $500–$1,000), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The MTP-S120L Solar Field at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

More Comparisons

Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono

Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's field watch

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $500–$1,000

Explore These Watches

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field — Full Review Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.