Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Casio's field watch meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150) offers Casio Tough Solar Quartz precision in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The MTP-S120L Solar Field measures 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Mako 40 Green counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

$100–$150

Orient Mako 40 Green

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio MTP-S120L Solar FieldOrient Mako 40 Green
Price$100–$150$250–$500
Case Size42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm)40mm
MovementSolar-Powered QuartzAutomatic Caliber F6722
Caliber TypeCasio Tough Solar QuartzOrient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power ReserveMonths on a full solar charge; no battery replacement40 Hours
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalMineral CrystalSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
OriginCasio (Japan)Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Orient's approach

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Solar-Powered Quartz vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Orient

42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Orient Mako 40 Green is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field is the better buy if you want solar power and quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Orient Mako 40 Green is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $250–$500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Orient Mako 40 Green may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The MTP-S120L Solar Field at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal while the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.