Updated
Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Casio's field watch meets Orient's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150) offers Casio Tough Solar Quartz precision in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The MTP-S120L Solar Field measures 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Mako 40 Green counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $100–$150 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) | 40mm |
| Movement | Solar-Powered Quartz | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Tough Solar Quartz | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Orient's approach
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Solar-Powered Quartz vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
MTP-S120L Solar Field
Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's field watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's field watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

