Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
Casio's timepiece meets Maurice Lacroix's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 ($150–$250) offers Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) precision in the tier below the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Pro Trek PRG270-1 measures 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Aikon Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 | Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $150–$250 | $1,500–$2,500 |
| Case Size | 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm | 42mm |
| Movement | Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) | Automatic ML115 |
| Caliber Type | Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) | Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) |
| Power Reserve | Tough Solar (Rechargeable) | 38 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Maurice Lacroix's approach
The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 features a Resin case at 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 42mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) vs Automatic ML115
The Pro Trek PRG270-1 runs the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) (Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change), Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Aikon Automatic uses the Automatic ML115 (Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base), 38 Hours reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz). The Aikon Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm vs 42mm — different wrist presence
At 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm, the Pro Trek PRG270-1 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Aikon Automatic at 42mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 sits at $150–$250 and the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Trek PRG270-1 uses Mineral Glass with Tough Solar (Rechargeable), against Sapphire Crystal and 38 Hours on the Aikon Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Pro Trek PRG270-1 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Aikon Automatic handles 200m (20 ATM). The Aikon Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Pro Trek PRG270-1
Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 if you prioritize Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $150–$250, it delivers Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonMaurice Lacroix
Aikon Automatic
Choose the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if you value Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 42mm proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ML115 with 38 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 and Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Maurice Lacroix delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Maurice Lacroix's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $150–$250
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.