Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $150–$250
Quick Verdict
The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 ($150–$250) delivers Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) technology in the tier below the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The Pro Trek PRG270-1 measures 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Powermatic 80.111. Both represent excellent choices in the timepiece category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 | Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $150–$250 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm |
| Movement | Automatic Powermatic 80.111 | Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) |
| Caliber Type | In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) | Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | Tough Solar (Rechargeable) |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Scratch-resistant Sapphire | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | 316L Stainless Steel | Resin |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Tissot's design language vs Casio's approach
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 features a 316L Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Scratch-resistant Sapphire protection. The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 offers Resin construction at 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Powermatic 80.111 vs Tough Solar (Solar Quartz)
The PRX Powermatic 80 runs the Automatic Powermatic 80.111 (In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Pro Trek PRG270-1 uses the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) (Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change), Tough Solar (Rechargeable) reserve) at standard. The PRX Powermatic 80 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the PRX Powermatic 80 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Pro Trek PRG270-1 at 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 at $150–$250. On the specs that outlast any price: the PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire with 80 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Tough Solar (Rechargeable) on the Pro Trek PRG270-1. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The PRX Powermatic 80 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Pro Trek PRG270-1 handles 100m (10 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Tissot
PRX Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 if you prioritize In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Pro Trek PRG270-1
Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 if you value Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm proportions. At $150–$250, the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 and Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 represent two distinct approaches to the timepiece category — the Tissot bringing Swiss Made tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tissot PRX vs Hamilton Khaki Field
Integrated bracelet sophistication meets military heritage
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Tissot's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.