Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 vs Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio's diver meets Casio's chronograph

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 ($250–$500). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 justifies its premium with Casio (Japan) heritage and Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

CasioPro Trek PRW3500T-7$250–$500 Check price CasioVintage A168WAUnder $50 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

$250–$500

Check Price Full Review

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7	Casio Vintage A168WA
Price	$250–$500	Under $50
Case Size	56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm	36.3mm
Movement	Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled	Quartz Module 3298
Caliber Type	Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6	Casio Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve	Tough Solar (Rechargeable)	—
Water Resistance	200m (20 ATM)	30m (3 ATM)
Crystal	Mineral Glass	Mineral Glass
Case Material	Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet	Stainless Steel & Resin
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Casio's approach

The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 features a Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet case at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Casio Vintage A168WA offers Stainless Steel & Resin construction at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled vs Quartz Module 3298

The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 runs the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled (Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6, Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Vintage A168WA uses the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm vs 36.3mm — different wrist presence

At 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm, the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 sits at $250–$500 and the Casio Vintage A168WA at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 uses Mineral Glass with Tough Solar (Rechargeable), against Mineral Glass and a standard reserve on the Vintage A168WA. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)

The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Vintage A168WA handles 30m (3 ATM). The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 if you prioritize Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 36.3mm proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz Module 3298 with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 and Casio Vintage A168WA represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 is rated 200 m against 30 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio Vintage A168WA sits a band lower (Under $50 against $250–$500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Casio Vintage A168WA offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) is similarly capable. Both use Mineral Glass.

More Comparisons

Casio Pro Trek PRG601 vs PRW3500T

Two Triple Sensor solar Pro Treks

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's diver

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA

Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50

Explore These Watches

Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 — Full Review Casio Vintage A168WA — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.