Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 vs Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square
Two divers compared — $250–$500 vs $50–$100
Quick Verdict
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square ($50–$100) delivers Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 ($250–$500). The G-Shock DW-5600 Square measures 42.8mm (Square) and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 justifies its premium with Casio (Japan) heritage and Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled. Both represent excellent choices in the diver category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 | Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm | 42.8mm (Square) |
| Movement | Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled | Quartz Module 3229 |
| Caliber Type | Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 | Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | Tough Solar (Rechargeable) | 2-Year Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet | Resin |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Casio's approach
The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 features a Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet case at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square offers Resin construction at 42.8mm (Square) with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled vs Quartz Module 3229
The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 runs the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled (Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6, Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve) at standard frequency. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square uses the Quartz Module 3229 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 2-Year Battery reserve) at standard. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm vs 42.8mm (Square) — different wrist presence
At 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm, the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the G-Shock DW-5600 Square at 42.8mm (Square). Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 sits at $250–$500 and the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 uses Mineral Glass with Tough Solar (Rechargeable), against Mineral Glass and 2-Year Battery on the G-Shock DW-5600 Square. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the G-Shock DW-5600 Square handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Casio
Pro Trek PRW3500T-7
Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 if you prioritize Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
G-Shock DW-5600 Square
Choose the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square if you value Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 42.8mm (Square) proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Module 3229 with 2-Year Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 and Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.