Casio Vintage A168WA vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Casio's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (~$45) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision at $1,250 less than the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase (~$1,295). The Classic Quartz Moonphase counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective price points.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$45 | ~$1,295 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 1572 | Quartz FC-206 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Swiss Quartz |
| Power Reserve | — | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Gold-Tone Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Frederique Constant's approach
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 1572 vs Quartz FC-206
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio is $1,250 more affordable
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At ~$45, it delivers Quartz Module 1572 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonFrederique Constant
Classic Quartz Moonphase
Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you value Swiss Quartz technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At ~$1,295, the Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Frederique Constant delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — ~$3,600 vs ~$45
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph