Casio Vintage A168WA vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — Under $50 vs $500–$1,000
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph counters with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional chronographs for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 45mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | High-Performance 262kHz Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | High-Performance Quartz |
| Power Reserve | — | N/A (Quartz) |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Made in Japan (Citizen Group) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Bulova's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph offers Stainless Steel construction at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs High-Performance 262kHz Quartz
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz). Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 45mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and N/A (Quartz) on the Lunar Pilot Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph handles 50m (5 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonBulova
Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you value High-Performance Quartz technology, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage, and 45mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to the chronograph category — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Bulova delivers Made in Japan (Citizen Group) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono
Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $500–$1,000
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.