Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio Vintage A168WA vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Casio's chronograph meets Maurice Lacroix's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Aikon Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

$1,500–$2,500

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Vintage A168WAMaurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
PriceUnder $50$1,500–$2,500
Case Size36.3mm42mm
MovementQuartz Module 3298Automatic ML115
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Battery)Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base)
Power Reserve38 Hours
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialStainless Steel & ResinStainless Steel
OriginMade in JapanSwiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Maurice Lacroix's approach

The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 42mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Maurice Lacroix

Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic ML115

The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Aikon Automatic uses the Automatic ML115 (Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base), 38 Hours reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz). The Aikon Automatic offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

36.3mm vs 42mm — different wrist presence

At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Aikon Automatic at 42mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 38 Hours on the Aikon Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Maurice Lacroix

30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Aikon Automatic handles 200m (20 ATM). The Aikon Automatic offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

Choose the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if you value Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 42mm proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ML115 with 38 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Vintage A168WA and Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Maurice Lacroix delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Quartz Module 3298 with reliable power reserve, while the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) features Automatic ML115 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan craftsmanship vs Swiss Made engineering.
The Casio Vintage A168WA offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Aikon Automatic at 42mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass while the Aikon Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.