Casio Vintage A168WA vs OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch
Casio's chronograph meets OLEVS's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch ($100–$150). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Moon Phase Dress Watch counters with OLEVS craftsmanship and robust water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $100–$150 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | — |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | — | — |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | — |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | — |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | OLEVS |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs OLEVS's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch offers Stainless Steel construction at mid-size with crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Quartz
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Moon Phase Dress Watch uses the Quartz (Quartz (Battery), standard reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs mid-size — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Moon Phase Dress Watch at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 50m.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against a hardened crystal and a standard reserve on the Moon Phase Dress Watch. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 50m
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Moon Phase Dress Watch handles 50m. The Vintage A168WA is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOLEVS
Moon Phase Dress Watch
Choose the OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, OLEVS heritage, and comfortable proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while OLEVS delivers OLEVS engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets OLEVS's dress watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.