Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio Vintage A168WA vs Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver

Casio's chronograph meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver ($250–$500). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Kamasu Automatic Diver counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver

Orient

Kamasu Automatic Diver

$250–$500

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Vintage A168WAOrient Kamasu Automatic Diver
PriceUnder $50$250–$500
Case Size36.3mm41.8mm
MovementQuartz Module 3298Automatic Caliber F6922
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Battery)Orient In-House Automatic
Power Reserve40 Hours
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialStainless Steel & ResinStainless Steel
OriginMade in JapanMade in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Orient's approach

The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver offers Stainless Steel construction at 41.8mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic Caliber F6922

The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Kamasu Automatic Diver uses the Automatic Caliber F6922 (Orient In-House Automatic, 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Kamasu Automatic Diver offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

36.3mm vs 41.8mm — different wrist presence

At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Kamasu Automatic Diver at 41.8mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Kamasu Automatic Diver. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Kamasu Automatic Diver handles 200m (20 ATM). The Kamasu Automatic Diver offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Kamasu Automatic Diver

Choose the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver if you value Orient In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 41.8mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6922 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Vintage A168WA and Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Quartz Module 3298 with reliable power reserve, while the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver ($250–$500) features Automatic Caliber F6922 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan craftsmanship vs Made in Japan engineering.
The Casio Vintage A168WA offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Kamasu Automatic Diver at 41.8mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass while the Kamasu Automatic Diver uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.