Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio Vintage A168WA vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm

Casio's chronograph meets Tissot's timepiece

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm ($500–$1,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm

Tissot

PRX Powermatic 80 35mm

$500–$1,000

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Vintage A168WATissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm
PriceUnder $50$500–$1,000
Case Size36.3mm35mm
MovementQuartz Module 3298Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Battery)ETA/Tissot Automatic
Power Reserve80 Hours
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)100m (10 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialStainless Steel & ResinStainless Steel
OriginMade in JapanSwiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach

The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm offers Stainless Steel construction at 35mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Tissot

Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)

The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Tissot

36.3mm vs 35mm — different wrist presence

At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA has a bolder wrist presence compared to the PRX Powermatic 80 35mm at 35mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the PRX Powermatic 80 35mm. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Tissot

30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)

The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the PRX Powermatic 80 35mm handles 100m (10 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Tissot

PRX Powermatic 80 35mm

Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 35mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Vintage A168WA and Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Quartz Module 3298 with reliable power reserve, while the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm ($500–$1,000) features Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan craftsmanship vs Swiss Made engineering.
The Casio Vintage A168WA offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 35mm may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The PRX Powermatic 80 35mm at 35mm with 100m (10 ATM) is similarly capable. The Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass while the PRX Powermatic 80 35mm uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.