Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase vs Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm
Frederique Constant's dress watch meets Hamilton's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm ($500–$1,000) delivers Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound technology in the tier below the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase ($1,000–$1,500). The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm measures 38mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Classic Quartz Moonphase justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Quartz FC-206. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase | Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,000–$1,500 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 38mm |
| Movement | Quartz FC-206 | Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) |
| Caliber Type | Swiss Quartz | Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound |
| Power Reserve | Battery | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Frederique Constant's design language vs Hamilton's approach
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal protection. The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm offers Stainless Steel construction at 38mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz FC-206 vs Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase runs the Quartz FC-206 (Swiss Quartz, Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm uses the Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) (Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 38mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Classic Quartz Moonphase has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm at 38mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Hamilton sits in the lower tier
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Quartz Moonphase uses Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal with Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm handles 50m (5 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Frederique Constant
Classic Quartz Moonphase
Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you prioritize Swiss Quartz engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonHamilton
Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm
Choose the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm if you value Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 38mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase and Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Frederique Constant bringing Swiss Made tradition while Hamilton delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Tissot Le Locle
Wind it yourself, or let it wind itself
Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Longines HydroConquest
A hand-wound field watch against a 300m Swiss diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

