Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Frederique Constant's dress watch meets Orient's diver
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) delivers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology in the tier below the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase ($1,000–$1,500). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Classic Quartz Moonphase justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Quartz FC-206. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,000–$1,500 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz FC-206 | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | Swiss Quartz | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | Battery | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Frederique Constant's design language vs Orient's approach
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz FC-206 vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The Classic Quartz Moonphase runs the Quartz FC-206 (Swiss Quartz, Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Classic Quartz Moonphase is similarly sized compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Quartz Moonphase uses Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal with Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Frederique Constant
Classic Quartz Moonphase
Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you prioritize Swiss Quartz engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Frederique Constant bringing Swiss Made tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tissot's timepiece meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.