Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Casio's diver meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak ($100–$150) and Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak emphasizes Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered) engineering while the 1920s Retrograde focuses on Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Casio

G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

$100–$150

Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOakStauer 1920s Retrograde
Price$100–$150$100–$150
Case Size45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick)43mm
MovementQuartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth)Quartz
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Solar-Powered)Quartz
Power ReserveAbout 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio)Battery
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
CrystalMineral GlassMineral crystal
Case MaterialCarbon Core Guard ResinGold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
OriginMade in JapanStauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak features a Carbon Core Guard Resin case at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) with Mineral Glass protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) vs Quartz

The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak runs the Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) (Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered), About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) power reserve) at standard frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Stauer

45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick), the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak has a bolder wrist presence compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak sits at $100–$150 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak uses Mineral Glass with About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio), against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Choose the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) with About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak emphasizes Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered) technology while the 1920s Retrograde prioritizes Quartz precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak uses Mineral Glass while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.