Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Two divers compared — $50–$100 vs $250–$500
Quick Verdict
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square ($50–$100) offers Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The G-Shock DW-5600 Square measures 42.8mm (Square) and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 42.8mm (Square) | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3229 | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | 2-Year Battery | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Orient's approach
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square features a Resin case at 42.8mm (Square) with Mineral Glass protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3229 vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The G-Shock DW-5600 Square runs the Quartz Module 3229 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 2-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
42.8mm (Square) vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 42.8mm (Square), the G-Shock DW-5600 Square has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square sits at $50–$100 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the G-Shock DW-5600 Square uses Mineral Glass with 2-Year Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The G-Shock DW-5600 Square is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Casio
G-Shock DW-5600 Square
Choose the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square if you prioritize Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 3229 with 2-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.