Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Hamilton's field watch meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm ($500–$1,000). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base). Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

HamiltonKhaki Field Mechanical 38mm$500–$1,000 Check price Stauer1920s Retrograde$100–$150 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Hamilton

Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm

$500–$1,000

Check Price Full Review

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm	Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Price	$500–$1,000	$100–$150
Case Size	38mm	43mm
Movement	Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base)	Quartz
Caliber Type	Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound	Quartz
Power Reserve	80 Hours	Battery
Water Resistance	50m (5 ATM)	100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
Crystal	Sapphire Crystal	Mineral crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel	Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
Origin	Swiss Made	Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Hamilton's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm features a Stainless Steel case at 38mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Hamilton

Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) vs Quartz

The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm runs the Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) (Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound, 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Hamilton

38mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 38mm, the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Stauer

Stauer sits in the lower tier

The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm sits at $500–$1,000 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm uses Sapphire Crystal with 80 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Stauer

50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The 1920s Retrograde offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Hamilton

Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm

Choose the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm if you prioritize Hamilton/ETA Hand-Wound engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Hand-Wound H-50 (ETA 2801-2 base) with 80 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Hamilton bringing Swiss Made tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $500–$1,000), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm at 38mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm uses Sapphire Crystal while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

More Comparisons

Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Tissot Le Locle

Wind it yourself, or let it wind itself

Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Longines HydroConquest

A hand-wound field watch against a 300m Swiss diver

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Hamilton's field watch

Explore These Watches

Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm — Full Review Stauer 1920s Retrograde — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.