Head-to-Head Comparison

Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Hamilton's chronograph meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) delivers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology in the tier below the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph ($2,500–$5,000). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic H-31. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph

Hamilton

Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph

$2,500–$5,000

Orient Mako 40 Green

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Specifications Compared

FeatureHamilton Intra-Matic Auto ChronographOrient Mako 40 Green
Price$2,500–$5,000$250–$500
Case Size40mm40mm
MovementAutomatic H-31Automatic Caliber F6722
Caliber TypeValjoux-Based Automatic ChronographOrient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve60 Hours40 Hours
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalSapphire (Domed)Sapphire Crystal
Case MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
OriginSwiss MadeMade in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Hamilton's design language vs Orient's approach

The Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire (Domed) protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Hamilton

Automatic H-31 vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph runs the Automatic H-31 (Valjoux-Based Automatic Chronograph, 60 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Draw

40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph is similarly sized compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Orient

Orient sits in the lower tier

The Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph sits at $2,500–$5,000 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph uses Sapphire (Domed) with 60 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Hamilton

Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph

Choose the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph if you prioritize Valjoux-Based Automatic Chronograph engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $2,500–$5,000, it delivers Automatic H-31 with 60 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Hamilton bringing Swiss Made tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph ($2,500–$5,000) offers Automatic H-31 with 60 Hours power reserve, while the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) features Automatic Caliber F6722 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Swiss Made craftsmanship vs Made in Japan engineering.
The Orient Mako 40 Green offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $250–$500. However, the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph at 40mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph uses Sapphire (Domed) while the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.