Head-to-Head Comparison

Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 vs Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer

Invicta's diver meets Mido's chronograph

Quick Verdict

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 ($50–$100) offers Automatic (Seiko NH35A) precision in the tier below the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer ($1,000–$1,500). The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 measures 40mm and is rated 200m. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic 23681

$50–$100

Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer

Mido

Multifort Powerwind Chronometer

$1,000–$1,500

Specifications Compared

FeatureInvicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer
Price$50–$100$1,000–$1,500
Case Size40mm40mm
MovementAutomatic NH35AAutomatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC)
Caliber TypeAutomatic (Seiko NH35A)Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic
Power Reserve80 Hours
Water Resistance200m100m (10 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating
Case MaterialStainless Steel
OriginInvicta (Japanese movement)Swiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Invicta's design language vs Mido's approach

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 features a steel case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Mido

Automatic NH35A vs Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC)

The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 runs the Automatic NH35A (Automatic (Seiko NH35A), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer uses the Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) (Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Draw

40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is similarly sized compared to the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m vs 100m (10 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Invicta

Invicta sits in the lower tier

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 sits at $50–$100 and the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating and 80 Hours on the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Invicta

200m vs 100m (10 ATM)

The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is rated to 200m while the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer handles 100m (10 ATM). The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic 23681

Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 if you prioritize Automatic (Seiko NH35A) engineering, Invicta (Japanese movement) craftsmanship, and 200m water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Automatic NH35A with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Mido

Multifort Powerwind Chronometer

Choose the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer if you value Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 and Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Invicta bringing Invicta (Japanese movement) tradition while Mido delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 ($50–$100) offers Automatic NH35A with reliable power reserve, while the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer ($1,000–$1,500) features Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Invicta (Japanese movement) craftsmanship vs Swiss Made engineering.
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 at 40mm with 200m water resistance handles everyday situations. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer at 40mm with 100m (10 ATM) is similarly capable. The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 uses Mineral Glass while the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.