Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Two divers compared — $50–$100 vs $1,000–$1,500
Quick Verdict
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 ($50–$100) offers Automatic (Seiko NH35A) precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 measures 40mm and is rated 200m. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 | Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40.5mm |
| Movement | Automatic NH35A | Automatic 6R35 |
| Caliber Type | Automatic (Seiko NH35A) | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | — | 70 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire |
| Case Material | — | Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating |
| Origin | Invicta (Japanese movement) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Invicta's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 features a steel case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating construction at 40.5mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic NH35A vs Automatic 6R35
The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 runs the Automatic NH35A (Automatic (Seiko NH35A), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40.5mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm. Water resistance differs: 200m vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Invicta sits in the lower tier
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 sits at $50–$100 and the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire and 70 Hours on the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is rated to 200m while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Invicta
Pro Diver Automatic 23681
Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 if you prioritize Automatic (Seiko NH35A) engineering, Invicta (Japanese movement) craftsmanship, and 200m water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Automatic NH35A with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40.5mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 and Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Invicta bringing Invicta (Japanese movement) tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)
Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Invicta's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.