Updated
Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Invicta's diver meets Stauer's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 ($50–$100) offers Automatic (Seiko NH35A) precision in the tier below the Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150). The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 measures 40mm and is rated 200m. The 1920s Retrograde counters with Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 | Stauer 1920s Retrograde |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $100–$150 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 43mm |
| Movement | Automatic NH35A | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Automatic (Seiko NH35A) | Quartz |
| Power Reserve | — | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m | 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Mineral crystal |
| Case Material | — | Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) |
| Origin | Invicta (Japanese movement) | Stauer (USA brand, imported) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Invicta's design language vs Stauer's approach
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 features a steel case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic NH35A vs Quartz
The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 runs the Automatic NH35A (Automatic (Seiko NH35A), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 200m vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Invicta sits in the lower tier
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 sits at $50–$100 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is rated to 200m while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Invicta
Pro Diver Automatic 23681
Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 if you prioritize Automatic (Seiko NH35A) engineering, Invicta (Japanese movement) craftsmanship, and 200m water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Automatic NH35A with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonStauer
1920s Retrograde
Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Invicta bringing Invicta (Japanese movement) tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Invicta's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681
Tissot's timepiece meets Invicta's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

