Invicta Pro Diver Automatic vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Two divers compared — $50–$100 vs $250–$500
Quick Verdict
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic ($50–$100) offers Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The Pro Diver Automatic measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Invicta Pro Diver Automatic | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Seiko NH35 | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | 41 Hours | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Invicta's design language vs Orient's approach
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Seiko NH35 vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The Pro Diver Automatic runs the Automatic Seiko NH35 (Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 41 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Pro Diver Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Pro Diver Automatic is similarly sized compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Invicta sits in the lower tier
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic sits at $50–$100 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Diver Automatic uses Mineral Glass with 41 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Pro Diver Automatic is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Invicta
Pro Diver Automatic
Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic if you prioritize Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Automatic Seiko NH35 with 41 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Invicta bringing Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.