Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Junghans Form A Automatic vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Two dress watchs compared — $1,000–$1,500 vs $100–$150

Quick Verdict

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Junghans Form A Automatic ($1,000–$1,500). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Form A Automatic justifies its premium with Made in Germany heritage and Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2). Both represent excellent choices in the dress watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Junghans Form A Automatic

Junghans

Form A Automatic

$1,000–$1,500

Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureJunghans Form A AutomaticStauer 1920s Retrograde
Price$1,000–$1,500$100–$150
Case Size39.3mm43mm
MovementAutomatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2)Quartz
Caliber TypeSwiss ETA Base, German-FinishedQuartz
Power Reserve38 HoursBattery
Water Resistance50m (5 ATM)100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
CrystalFlat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective CoatingMineral crystal
Case MaterialStainless SteelGold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
OriginMade in GermanyStauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Junghans's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Junghans Form A Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 39.3mm with Flat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Junghans

Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2) vs Quartz

The Form A Automatic runs the Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2) (Swiss ETA Base, German-Finished, 38 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The Form A Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Junghans

39.3mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 39.3mm, the Form A Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Stauer

Stauer sits in the lower tier

The Junghans Form A Automatic sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Form A Automatic uses Flat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating with 38 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Stauer

50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Form A Automatic is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The 1920s Retrograde offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Junghans

Form A Automatic

Choose the Junghans Form A Automatic if you prioritize Swiss ETA Base, German-Finished engineering, Made in Germany craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2) with 38 Hours power reserve.

View the dossier

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Junghans Form A Automatic and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to the dress watch category — the Junghans bringing Made in Germany tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Junghans Form A Automatic is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $1,000–$1,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Junghans Form A Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Form A Automatic at 39.3mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Form A Automatic uses Flat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.