Updated
Longines HydroConquest Automatic vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Longines's diver meets Stauer's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Longines HydroConquest Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The HydroConquest Automatic justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic L888.5. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Longines HydroConquest Automatic | Stauer 1920s Retrograde |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,500–$2,500 | $100–$150 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 43mm |
| Movement | Automatic L888.5 | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring | Quartz |
| Power Reserve | 72 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 300m (30 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer |
| Crystal | Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating | Mineral crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Stauer (USA brand, imported) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Longines's design language vs Stauer's approach
The Longines HydroConquest Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic L888.5 vs Quartz
The HydroConquest Automatic runs the Automatic L888.5 (ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring, 72 Hours power reserve) at 25,200 vph (3.5 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The HydroConquest Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the HydroConquest Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 300m (30 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Stauer sits in the lower tier
The Longines HydroConquest Automatic sits at $1,500–$2,500 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the HydroConquest Automatic uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating with 72 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
300m (30 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
The HydroConquest Automatic is rated to 300m (30 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The HydroConquest Automatic is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Longines
HydroConquest Automatic
Choose the Longines HydroConquest Automatic if you prioritize ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. At $1,500–$2,500, it delivers Automatic L888.5 with 72 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonStauer
1920s Retrograde
Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Longines HydroConquest Automatic and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Longines bringing Swiss Made tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tudor Black Bay 58 vs Longines HydroConquest
Is the price jump to Tudor justified?
Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Longines HydroConquest
A hand-wound field watch against a 300m Swiss diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Longines HydroConquest Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Longines's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

