Longines HydroConquest Automatic vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Longines's diver meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Longines HydroConquest Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The HydroConquest Automatic justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic L888.5. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Longines HydroConquest Automatic | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,500–$2,500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic L888.5 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 72 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 300m (30 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Longines's design language vs Timex's approach
The Longines HydroConquest Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic L888.5 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The HydroConquest Automatic runs the Automatic L888.5 (ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring, 72 Hours power reserve) at 25,200 vph (3.5 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The HydroConquest Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the HydroConquest Automatic has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 300m (30 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Longines HydroConquest Automatic sits at $1,500–$2,500 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the HydroConquest Automatic uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating with 72 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
300m (30 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The HydroConquest Automatic is rated to 300m (30 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The HydroConquest Automatic is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Longines
HydroConquest Automatic
Choose the Longines HydroConquest Automatic if you prioritize ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. At $1,500–$2,500, it delivers Automatic L888.5 with 72 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Longines HydroConquest Automatic and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Longines bringing Swiss Made tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tudor Black Bay 58 vs Longines HydroConquest
Is the price jump to Tudor justified?
Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Longines HydroConquest
A hand-wound field watch against a 300m Swiss diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Longines HydroConquest Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Longines's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.