Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph vs Orient Bambino Version 2
Bulova's chronograph meets Orient's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Orient Bambino Version 2 ($150–$250) delivers Orient In-House Automatic technology in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The Bambino Version 2 measures 41mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage and High-Performance 262kHz Quartz. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph | Orient Bambino Version 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $150–$250 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 41mm |
| Movement | High-Performance 262kHz Quartz | Automatic Caliber F6724 |
| Caliber Type | High-Performance Quartz | Orient In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | N/A (Quartz) | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Domed Mineral Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Citizen Group) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Orient's approach
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Orient Bambino Version 2 offers Stainless Steel construction at 41mm with Domed Mineral Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
High-Performance 262kHz Quartz vs Automatic Caliber F6724
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph runs the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) power reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz) frequency. The Bambino Version 2 uses the Automatic Caliber F6724 (Orient In-House Automatic, 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Bambino Version 2 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 41mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Lunar Pilot Chronograph has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Bambino Version 2 at 41mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph sits at $500–$1,000 and the Orient Bambino Version 2 at $150–$250. On the specs that outlast any price: the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal with N/A (Quartz), against Domed Mineral Crystal and 40 Hours on the Bambino Version 2. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Bambino Version 2 handles 30m (3 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you prioritize High-Performance Quartz engineering, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Bambino Version 2
Choose the Orient Bambino Version 2 if you value Orient In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 41mm proportions. At $150–$250, the Automatic Caliber F6724 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph and Orient Bambino Version 2 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Citizen Group) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono
Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage
Orient Bambino vs Seiko Alpinist
A dress watch and an explorer, three price bands apart
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $500–$1,000
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.