Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Bulova's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000) offers High-Performance Quartz precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph measures 45mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph | Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 40.5mm |
| Movement | High-Performance 262kHz Quartz | Automatic 6R35 |
| Caliber Type | High-Performance Quartz | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | N/A (Quartz) | 70 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Citizen Group) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating construction at 40.5mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
High-Performance 262kHz Quartz vs Automatic 6R35
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph runs the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) power reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz) frequency. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 40.5mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Lunar Pilot Chronograph has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Bulova sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph sits at $500–$1,000 and the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal with N/A (Quartz), against Sapphire and 70 Hours on the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation handles 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers superior water resistance.
Materials Face-Off
| Component | Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph | Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Movement | Bulova High Performance Quartz, 262 kHz (262,144 Hz) | Seiko Caliber 6R35 |
| Crystal | Sapphire with anti-reflective coating | Sapphire with anti-reflective coating on inner surface |
| Case | Stainless steel 316L (brushed and polished) | Stainless steel with Seiko's "Super-Hard Coating" (Diashield) |
| Bezel | Fixed tachymeter | Unidirectional rotating, anodized aluminum insert with 60-minute dive scale and lume pip at 12 |
Cost of Ownership Compared
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph saves you $942 over 5 years of ownership
Who Should Pick Which
Pick the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if…
- Strong value proposition under $1,000 with quality construction
- Those who prioritize scratch resistance — sapphire crystal
- Chronograph enthusiasts looking for a proven timing instrument
- Heritage enthusiasts drawn to ** Bulova's historical pedigree
- Buyers who prefer a commanding wrist presence — 45mm case
Pick the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if…
- Enthusiasts wanting proven Swiss/Japanese quality in the $1,000–$2,000 sweet spot
- Dive watch enthusiasts — 200m water resistance is proper dive spec
- Weekend warriors — 70-hour power reserve means it survives two days off the wrist
- Those who prioritize scratch resistance — sapphire crystal
- Dive watch collectors who appreciate proper ISO-rated tool watches
Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
- 45mm is large.
- Quartz won't satisfy mechanical purists.
- Bulova brand prestige is below Omega; some buyers feel the brand undersells the Apollo provenance.
Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
- Chapter ring alignment QC inconsistency.
- Aluminum bezel insert (vs ceramic on Tudor / Omega).
- 6R35 accuracy varies unit-to-unit.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you prioritize High-Performance Quartz engineering, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40.5mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph and Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Citizen Group) tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)
Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving
Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono
Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $500–$1,000
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.