Head-to-Head Comparison

Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Two divers compared — $1,500–$2,500 vs $250–$500

Quick Verdict

The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) delivers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology in the tier below the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Aikon Automatic justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic ML115. Both represent excellent choices in the diver category.

Maurice LacroixAikon Automatic$1,500–$2,500 Check price OrientMako 40 Green$250–$500 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

$1,500–$2,500

Check Price Full Review

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic	Orient Mako 40 Green
Price	$1,500–$2,500	$250–$500
Case Size	42mm	40mm
Movement	Automatic ML115	Automatic Caliber F6722
Caliber Type	Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base)	Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve	38 Hours	40 Hours
Water Resistance	200m (20 ATM)	200m (20 ATM)
Crystal	Sapphire Crystal	Sapphire Crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel	Stainless Steel
Origin	Swiss Made	Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Maurice Lacroix's design language vs Orient's approach

The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Automatic ML115 vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The Aikon Automatic runs the Automatic ML115 (Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base), 38 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Orient

42mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 42mm, the Aikon Automatic has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Orient

Orient sits in the lower tier

The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic sits at $1,500–$2,500 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Aikon Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal with 38 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Aikon Automatic is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

Choose the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if you prioritize Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $1,500–$2,500, it delivers Automatic ML115 with 38 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Maurice Lacroix bringing Swiss Made tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) offers Automatic ML115 with 38 Hours power reserve, while the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) features Automatic Caliber F6722 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Swiss Made craftsmanship vs Made in Japan engineering.

The Orient Mako 40 Green offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $250–$500. However, the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Aikon Automatic at 42mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. Both use Sapphire Crystal, which resists scratches well.

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Maurice Lacroix's diver

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Tissot's timepiece meets Maurice Lacroix's diver

Explore These Watches

Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic — Full Review Orient Mako 40 Green — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.