Mido Ocean Star GMT vs Timex Weekender Chronograph
Mido's diver meets Timex's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Timex Weekender Chronograph ($50–$100) delivers Quartz Chronograph (Battery) technology in the tier below the Mido Ocean Star GMT ($1,000–$1,500). The Weekender Chronograph measures 40mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Ocean Star GMT justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661). Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Mido Ocean Star GMT | Timex Weekender Chronograph |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,000–$1,500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) | Quartz Chronograph |
| Caliber Type | Automatic (ETA C07.661 base) | Quartz Chronograph (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire with Double-sided AR | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Silver-Tone) |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Mido's design language vs Timex's approach
The Mido Ocean Star GMT features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Sapphire with Double-sided AR protection. The Timex Weekender Chronograph offers Brass (Silver-Tone) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) vs Quartz Chronograph
The Ocean Star GMT runs the Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) (Automatic (ETA C07.661 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Weekender Chronograph uses the Quartz Chronograph (Quartz Chronograph (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Ocean Star GMT edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 44mm, the Ocean Star GMT has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Weekender Chronograph at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Mido Ocean Star GMT sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Timex Weekender Chronograph at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Ocean Star GMT uses Sapphire with Double-sided AR with 80 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Weekender Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Ocean Star GMT is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Weekender Chronograph handles 30m (3 ATM). The Ocean Star GMT is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Mido
Ocean Star GMT
Choose the Mido Ocean Star GMT if you prioritize Automatic (ETA C07.661 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) with 80 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Weekender Chronograph
Choose the Timex Weekender Chronograph if you value Quartz Chronograph (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Chronograph with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Mido Ocean Star GMT and Timex Weekender Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Mido bringing Swiss Made tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.