Head-to-Head Comparison

Orient Mako 40 Green vs Rado True Square Automatic

Orient's diver meets Rado's timepiece

Quick Verdict

The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) offers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision in the tier below the Rado True Square Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The True Square Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Orient Mako 40 Green

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Rado True Square Automatic

Rado

True Square Automatic

$1,500–$2,500

Specifications Compared

FeatureOrient Mako 40 GreenRado True Square Automatic
Price$250–$500$1,500–$2,500
Case Size40mm38mm (Square)
MovementAutomatic Caliber F6722Automatic ETA C07.611
Caliber TypeOrient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based)
Power Reserve40 Hours80 Hours
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalSapphire CrystalSapphire (Anti-Reflective)
Case MaterialStainless SteelMonobloc High-Tech Ceramic
OriginMade in JapanSwiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Orient's design language vs Rado's approach

The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Rado True Square Automatic offers Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic construction at 38mm (Square) with Sapphire (Anti-Reflective). Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Rado

Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Automatic ETA C07.611

The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The True Square Automatic uses the Automatic ETA C07.611 (Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based), 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The True Square Automatic offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Rado

40mm vs 38mm (Square) — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green has a bolder wrist presence compared to the True Square Automatic at 38mm (Square). Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Orient

Orient sits in the lower tier

The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Rado True Square Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) and 80 Hours on the True Square Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the True Square Automatic handles 50m (5 ATM). The Mako 40 Green is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Rado

True Square Automatic

Choose the Rado True Square Automatic if you value Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 38mm (Square) proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ETA C07.611 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Orient Mako 40 Green and Rado True Square Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Rado delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) offers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve, while the Rado True Square Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) features Automatic ETA C07.611 with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan craftsmanship vs Swiss Made engineering.
The Orient Mako 40 Green offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $250–$500. However, the Rado True Square Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The True Square Automatic at 38mm (Square) with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal while the True Square Automatic uses Sapphire (Anti-Reflective).

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.