Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Tissot's timepiece meets Orient's diver
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) delivers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology in the tier below the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Powermatic 80.111. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Powermatic 80.111 | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Scratch-resistant Sapphire | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | 316L Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Tissot's design language vs Orient's approach
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 features a 316L Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Scratch-resistant Sapphire protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Powermatic 80.111 vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The PRX Powermatic 80 runs the Automatic Powermatic 80.111 (In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The PRX Powermatic 80 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the PRX Powermatic 80 is similarly sized compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire with 80 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The PRX Powermatic 80 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Tissot
PRX Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 if you prioritize In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Tissot bringing Swiss Made tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.