Orient Mako 40 Green vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Two divers compared — $250–$500 vs $1,000–$1,500
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) offers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Orient Mako 40 Green | Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40.5mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber F6722 | Automatic 6R35 |
| Caliber Type | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 40 Hours | 70 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Orient's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating construction at 40.5mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Automatic 6R35
The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40.5mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Sapphire and 70 Hours on the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Orient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40.5mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Orient Mako 40 Green and Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)
Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.