Orient Mako 40 Green vs Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm
Orient's diver meets Timex's timepiece
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) and Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Mako 40 Green emphasizes Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering while the Marlin Automatic 40mm focuses on Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Orient Mako 40 Green | Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber F6722 | Automatic Miyota 8205 |
| Caliber Type | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Miyota Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 40 Hours | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Made in Japan (Movement) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Orient's design language vs Timex's approach
The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Mineral Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Automatic Miyota 8205
The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Marlin Automatic 40mm uses the Automatic Miyota 8205 (Miyota Automatic, 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green is similarly sized compared to the Marlin Automatic 40mm at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Mineral Crystal and 40 Hours on the Marlin Automatic 40mm. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Marlin Automatic 40mm handles 30m (3 ATM). The Mako 40 Green is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Orient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Marlin Automatic 40mm
Choose the Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm if you value Miyota Automatic technology, Made in Japan (Movement) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Miyota 8205 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Orient Mako 40 Green and Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Made in Japan (Movement) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.