Orient Mako 40 Green vs Tissot Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80

Orient's design language vs Tissot's approach

The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Tissot Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80 offers Stainless Steel construction at 42.0mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)

The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80 uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80 offers a longer power reserve.

40mm vs 42.0mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80 at 42.0mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

Orient sits in the lower tier

The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Tissot Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Chemin des Tourelles Powermatic 80 handles 50m (5 ATM). The Mako 40 Green is better suited for water activities.