Orient Mako 40 Green vs Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80
Orient's diver meets Tissot's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) offers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision in the tier below the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Le Locle Powermatic 80 counters with Swiss Made (Swatch Group) craftsmanship and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Orient Mako 40 Green | Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 39.3mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber F6722 | Powermatic 80.111 |
| Caliber Type | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | ETA-Based Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 40 Hours | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made (Swatch Group) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Orient's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers Stainless Steel construction at 39.3mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Powermatic 80.111
The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Le Locle Powermatic 80 uses the Powermatic 80.111 (ETA-Based Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 39.3mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Le Locle Powermatic 80 at 39.3mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Le Locle Powermatic 80. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Le Locle Powermatic 80 handles 30m (3 ATM). The Mako 40 Green is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Orient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Le Locle Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 if you value ETA-Based Automatic technology, Swiss Made (Swatch Group) heritage, and 39.3mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Orient Mako 40 Green and Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made (Swatch Group) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.