Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Timex Q Timex Reissue vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

Two divers compared — $100–$150 vs $1,000–$1,500

Quick Verdict

The Timex Q Timex Reissue ($100–$150) offers Timex Quartz precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Q Timex Reissue measures 38mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Timex Q Timex Reissue

Timex

Q Timex Reissue

$100–$150

Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

Seiko

Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

$1,000–$1,500

Specifications Compared

FeatureTimex Q Timex ReissueSeiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Price$100–$150$1,000–$1,500
Case Size38mm40.5mm
MovementQuartzAutomatic 6R35
Caliber TypeTimex QuartzSeiko In-House Automatic
Power Reserve—70 Hours
Water Resistance50m (5 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalAcrylic CrystalSapphire
Case MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating
OriginAssembled in PhilippinesMade in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Timex's design language vs Seiko's approach

The Timex Q Timex Reissue features a Stainless Steel case at 38mm with Acrylic Crystal protection. The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating construction at 40.5mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Seiko

Quartz vs Automatic 6R35

The Q Timex Reissue runs the Quartz (Timex Quartz, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

38mm vs 40.5mm — different wrist presence

At 38mm, the Q Timex Reissue wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Timex Q Timex Reissue sits at $100–$150 and the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Q Timex Reissue uses Acrylic Crystal with a standard reserve, against Sapphire and 70 Hours on the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Seiko

50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Q Timex Reissue is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation handles 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Timex

Q Timex Reissue

Choose the Timex Q Timex Reissue if you prioritize Timex Quartz engineering, Assembled in Philippines craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Quartz with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Seiko

Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40.5mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Timex Q Timex Reissue and Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Timex bringing Assembled in Philippines tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Timex Q Timex Reissue is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is rated 200 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Q Timex Reissue sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $1,000–$1,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Timex Q Timex Reissue offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Q Timex Reissue at 38mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Q Timex Reissue uses Acrylic Crystal while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses Sapphire. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than acrylic.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.