Rolex Datejust 41 vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Rolex's dress watch meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Rolex Datejust 41 ($5,000–$10,000). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Datejust 41 justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Caliber 3235. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Rolex Datejust 41 | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5,000–$10,000 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber 3235 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 70 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Oystersteel | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Rolex's design language vs Timex's approach
The Rolex Datejust 41 features a Oystersteel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber 3235 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The Datejust 41 runs the Automatic Caliber 3235 (Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day), 70 Hours power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Datejust 41 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Datejust 41 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Rolex Datejust 41 sits at $5,000–$10,000 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Datejust 41 uses Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops with 70 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Datejust 41 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Datejust 41 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Rolex
Datejust 41
Choose the Rolex Datejust 41 if you prioritize Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $5,000–$10,000, it delivers Automatic Caliber 3235 with 70 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Rolex Datejust 41 and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Rolex bringing Swiss Made tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Rolex Datejust 41
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Rolex's dress watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Rolex Datejust 41
Tissot's timepiece meets Rolex's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.