Updated
Seiko 5 SNKL23 vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Seiko's timepiece meets Stauer's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Seiko 5 SNKL23 ($100–$150) and Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The 5 SNKL23 emphasizes Seiko Automatic (no hand-winding, no hacking) engineering while the 1920s Retrograde focuses on Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Seiko 5 SNKL23 | Stauer 1920s Retrograde |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $100–$150 | $100–$150 |
| Case Size | 37mm | 43mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber 7S26 | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Seiko Automatic (no hand-winding, no hacking) | Quartz |
| Power Reserve | 41 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer |
| Crystal | Hardlex Crystal | Mineral crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) |
| Origin | Japanese Movement | Stauer (USA brand, imported) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Seiko's design language vs Stauer's approach
The Seiko 5 SNKL23 features a Stainless Steel case at 37mm with Hardlex Crystal protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber 7S26 vs Quartz
The 5 SNKL23 runs the Automatic Caliber 7S26 (Seiko Automatic (no hand-winding, no hacking), 41 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The 5 SNKL23 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
37mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence
At 37mm, the 5 SNKL23 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Seiko 5 SNKL23 sits at $100–$150 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the 5 SNKL23 uses Hardlex Crystal with 41 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
The 5 SNKL23 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The 1920s Retrograde offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Seiko
5 SNKL23
Choose the Seiko 5 SNKL23 if you prioritize Seiko Automatic (no hand-winding, no hacking) engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Automatic Caliber 7S26 with 41 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonStauer
1920s Retrograde
Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Seiko 5 SNKL23 and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Seiko bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.