Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7
Bulova's timepiece meets Casio's diver
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) and Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic engineering while the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 focuses on Casio (Japan) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 | Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm |
| Movement | Automatic, 21 Jewels | Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled |
| Caliber Type | Self-Winding Automatic | Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 |
| Power Reserve | — | Tough Solar (Rechargeable) |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Domed Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel | Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet |
| Origin | Japanese Movement | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 offers Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet construction at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled
The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 uses the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled (Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6, Tough Solar (Rechargeable) reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Mineral Glass and Tough Solar (Rechargeable) on the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 handles 200m (20 ATM). The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Classic Automatic 98A139
Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Pro Trek PRW3500T-7
Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 if you value Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $250–$500
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.